Well, once again I have failed to help effect the ouster of Jim Flaherty and / or his hateful wife. I still maintain I should have locomotorized him when I had the chance... Ah, well. The election was an unfortunate bit of predictability, as people went with the safe choice, and I think that's too bad. I don't particularly take issue with the Liberals; even at their worst they're still light years ahead of the Harris years, but I do think that a minority situation would have served the people much better.
It's a real shame that Tory thought he had to go negative to win, because you could see in his concession speech that he has the class and charisma to draw voters. Sadly, throughout his campaign he just looked like the classic helmet-haired conservative hack going negative, and the faith-based school issue, while apparently a promise he made at a leadership convention well before the election, was a foolish thing to get caught up in. Ultimately, he should have attempted to project the image that was on display in his concession, instead of hammering away with remarkable futility at McGuinty.
And then there's that farmer's coalition member that got elected. I find it humorous that he was yattering on about "honesty in government" and changes to the status quo when he dodged every question they asked him, looking for all the world like he was more slippery than the most grubby of politicians. I think if anyone in politics ever came out and answered a question directly, the sun would explode. Is there really any point in dissembling? No, Tory doesn't really have total control over his situation, and for all the "we're going to evaluate the situations" that were offered up last night, it seems clear that he's probably headed for the chopping block. I know you're not supposed to show weakness and all that, but let's face it; he led his party to a dismal showing that eclipsed even the nadir of 2003.
And then there's McGuinty's loathsome victory speech. Far be it for me to criticize an act of public speaking, but whoever had the idea to lift his theme source-direct from the 8th-inning canned noiseathon at SkyDome deserves a healthy cockpunch. We Are Ontario would be much more resonant if only the nonsense he was spewing had any relation to actual events, and not just gibberish that sounds like it could do with a sprinkling of Alan Parsons Project in the background.
And what the heck was up with everyone and their "RUNNING FOR POLITICS IS BRAVERY" spiehl? The only bravery I have ever seen associated with the practice is in the pure gall shown by politicians who raise their salaries by 25% and then tut tut over minimum wage increases. Sorry, fellows, but you are not Sparta. Not yours. Those gratuitous PDAs were certainly something though! Yep, Terri and Barb are super ladies, and I imagine Shelley Martel might have been on display if only Howard Hampton wasn't slightly classier than that, and covered in a fine sheen of allergy-related grease-sweat besides.
And finally, 50% turnout is dismal. Anyone who didn't vote should be ashamed of themselves, because even a raft full of bad choices is better than no choice at all. I know it sounds trite, but to complain bitterly about these people and then do nothing about it smacks of hypocrisy to me, and I have to wonder if Australia doesn't have the right idea in fining people who don't vote.